A portal for homeopathic students, teachers & professionals



whole web in this site

Recommend this site
  Home    |     About Us   |    Latest   |    Links   |    Guest Book   |    Contact
 
   Professional
    Homeopathic Education
Homeopathy General
Homeopathic Materia Medica
Materia Medica - Group Study
Homeopathic Repertory
Organon and Philosophy
Homeopathic Pharmacy
Practice of Medicine
Case Presentations
Clinical Tips
Psychology
Research
Pioneers
Homeopathic Drug Proving
Homeopathic Softwares
     
   Competitive
   

Exam Notifications
Exam Results
MOH(UAE) War room
MD(Hom) Entrance
Kerala PSC (Tutor)
Kerala PSC (MO)
UPSC (MO/Lecturer)
Nurse cum Pharmacist
Ask Dr.Mansoor

     
   Read
    Book reviews
Latest Books
Journal reviews
Thesis for PGs
Softwares
Medical Ethics
Hahnemannian Oath
     
    Last Moment Revisions
    Materia Medica
Case taking & Repertory
Homeopathic Pharmacy
Organon of Medicine
Practice of Medicine
Forensic Medicine
Anatomy
Physiology
Biochemistry

Mind Rubrics
Kent's Repertory
Boger's Repertory
Easy Materia Medica
Easy Organon
     
   Informations
    Opportunities in Homeopathy
Notifications
Homeo world
Events
  Kerala
  National
  International
     
   Similima
    About Us
Our team
Our motto
Perspectives
Donate
Advertise
Disclaimer
Site map
Copy right
Privacy Policy
Guidelines to authors

 
   
   
   
   Recommend this page to a friend
   Send your Feedback
 Life and Works of Hahnemann by Richard Haehl 
Dr. Shajahan. BHMS,MD(Hom) 
Approved Practitioner, MOH UAE
 


About The Author and book 
   Richard Haehl was a German citizen .He went to Philadelphia to study Homoeopathy at the Hahnemann College .By that time Dr had published a biography of Hahnemann “Life and Letters of Samuel Hahnemann was based on Dr.Constantine Hering’s directions given through an article The essentials for judging Hahnemann correctly” in 1847.Haehl wished to translate this book into German - w soon found that many of the were incomplete and incorrect.

Being ŕn American Bradford could only do that much. Haehl decided to stop the translation work, and to write a new one .It took about 25 years (from 1898 - 1922 ) to collect all the available documents from German,English and French - all the journals and letters of Hahnernann, Documents from his disciples,relatives,from private and public museums .He had referred church registers arid other official registers to make it more accurate regarding dates and names. He compiled the whole thing and published by the name “Samuel Hahnemann Sein Lebon und Shaffen” in German Stuart - son of Hahnemann's late disciple,Mr.Peter Stpart translated this work into English with the assistance of Mrs .Marie Wheeler,Mr .Sydney Grundy, Dr .F .J .Wheeler and Mrs.Strafford - all were expert linguists.It was edited by Dr.J.H.Clarke and F.J.Wheeler.The whole thing was under the supervision of Dr .J .H .Haehl. 

The book was published in 2 volumes.
In volume 1 Dr.Haehl tells the story in his own words.
In volume 2, the original documents - letters of Hahnemann and others have been. included.
 
Christian Frederick Samuel Hahnemann was born as the third child of the artist painter. Christian Gottfried Hahnemann on the midnight of April 1755 at Meissen. (P—8--l.p)
His grand father Christopher Hahnemaann, his father Christian Gottfried and one of father's brothers Christian August were all painters.His father even published small book on water color painting This shows an unusual artistic talent and a strong inclination for art in Hahnemann’s family.(P 6)
At the end of his school years in Princess School at Easter in 1775 Hahnemann submitted a dissertation “The Wonderful. Construction of Human Hand” .This self - chosen work was a pointer to the field of his interest.He also penetrated deeply in to Greek arid Latin classics that he could even teach others the rudiments of it even at-the age of 12 (P 18 ).

After leaving from school Hahnemann joined in Leipsic University in 1775. Thereafter he never received any financial aid from his parents, nor returned to home ever for a single day was obliged to devote the whole time to the study which he had chosen and to the study for earning his living .Side by side with his studies he gave private lessons in French arid German to rich young Greek and translated English works into German .During his 2 years stay in Leipsic he translated John Steadmann’s

“Physiological experiments and observations -with Copper”, Nuganton Hvdropihia”’Felkoner on mineral water and warm bath” : Balls new art of healing :- Through this he did both earning a learning.

In Leipsic he had attended lectures only selectively.Even though Leipsic was one of the famous Universities in Germany, there was no place for practial medical science. So Hahnemann left for Vienna. There was a hospital of the Brothers of Mercy in Leopoldstadt,under the direction of Dr.Von Quarin physician in ordinary to the Empress.

Hahnemann joined the hospital.Dr.Quarin felt great impression of him became Hahnemann’s teacher as well as a good friend.. He gave him his attention and took him on his visits to his private patients,which he did for no other pupils.
After a strenuous term of practical work Hahnemann went to Herrnanstadt for economic benefit where he worked under the Governor of Transylvania - Baron von Brukenthal as his book keeper .Here he studied two more languages - Rumanian and Magyar.

After that he went to Erlangen , from where he secured the medical degree in 1779, August 1Oth . His dissertation was-_ Conspectus adfectumspasmodicorum aetiologicus et therapeuticus” ( a view of the causes and treatment of cramps)ram )
Hahnemann began M practice in Hettstedt at the age of 24. It was the copper mining and he was not able to develop either mentally or physically. He began to write articles in Kreb ‘s” Medical Observation’”

After one year he moved to Dessau. It was the centre of intelligence and at the same time was near one of the mining districts. So he got an opportunity for studying mining science, metallurgy and chemistry along with his practice - came into contact with Haseler’s pharmacy - became acquainted with Johanna Leopoldstine Henritte - They decided to marry

In order to acquire better financial assistance he accepted the post of medical officer of Health of Gornmern in 1781. Got married in 17th Nov. 1782
He continued his research in Chemistry and came to know about the French chemist –Demachy. Demachi’ s book The wholes scael- manufacture of Chemicals ,or the science of preparing chemical products in factories” was to break the monopoly of Dutch in chemical industry,who strictly guarded their secrets. Hahnemann translated this French work into German.It was not in a mere mechanical way, but he had inserted so many footnotes and independent references. He made many complicated procedures of Dęmachy,more easier .This shows Hahnernann’s vast and thorough knowledge in Chemistry.At the same time he wrote many articles regarding his actual profession, in Dr.Kreb’s “ Medical Observations ‘ . Most important among these articles was Directions for curing old sores and indolent ulcers”in 1784—(29)

In this we find for the first time, apart from dissatisfaction with his own medical knowledge and experience arid with medical science in general,some sharp ruthless criticisms of the latter as well as of his colleagues.

He writes “we treat cicatrizing old ulcers after many fruitless application o salves ,by causing several artificial sores,wh only means ‘exchanging one old wound for several. The majority of the physician refused to treat and leaved it to the barber surgeon, to shepherds and to hangmen. Veterinary surgeons are usually more succesful in treating wounds than the most learned professors and. members of the academies Almost all our knowledge of the healing properties of the simple and natural as well as of the artificial products, is largely derived from the crude and automatic applications of the ordinary man, and that the physicians frequently draw important deductions from the consequences of the effects of the so called household remedies.” Hahnemann strongly criticised the use of alcohol and coffee, - the internal use of corrosive sublimate and also the c application of lead .asters and lead ointments. Above all, he demanded cleanliness. re scraped the diseased bone clean, separated out the unhealthy portion, bandaged it with alcohol and waited for the result. He recommended fresh air, exercise, cheerful conversation, application of water, warm and cold baths. At the same time he said nothing against blood letting for woman at menopause and for fever.

In spite of his ruthless criticism his suggestions were favorably accepted. by medical men. Hahneman then moved to Dessau, got acquainted with the Medical Officer of Health, Dr.Wagner.Here he got an opportunity to work in Forensic Medicine. He relinquished his medical practice and completely concentrated in translation works and in writng new articles. He translated few more books of Demachy, wrote an essay “The signs of the purity and adulteration of drugs.’ in association with B .V .D .Sande .He introduced few tests to detect impurities of medicines in this essay. Thus irk 1785 to 1789 he published more than 2, 200 printed papers. He also wrote an essay Arsenic poisoning” in which he described various methods for forensic detection of arsenic, and raised his voice against “fever powders’ and mad€; detailed suggestions for the prescribing of poisons in general .These were accepted by the authorities.

To improve his literary works Hahnemann again moved to Leipsic . Here also he avoided medical practice. Translated many books from English,French and one from Italian - Grigg “Precautit: measures for female sex’, Monro‘s” Materia Medica” & Cullens” Treatise on Materia Medica’. Almost all of his works were in relation with chemistry and medicine. In the translation Cullen’s Materia medica he fought for the first time against__blood letting and purging . Many works like ‘Friend of health” has been started in Leipsic.

While translating Cullen s” Materia Medica” Hahnemann came across the opinion of Cullen about the efficacy of Cinchona bark in curing intermittent fever . Cullen defended the old opinion through its “tonic effect on the stomach” . Hahnemann opposed this argument . He stated that by combining the strongest bitters and the strongest astringents we can obtain a compound, which in small doses, possesses much more of these properties than the bark and yet no fever specifics can be made from such a compound.

He took for several days as an experiment ,four drams of good china twice daily. It produced a number o symptoms which he felt similar to that of intermittent fever because he had already suffered from an attack of intermittent fever while in Transylvania .From that he deduced partly by intuition and partly by logical reasoning, that ‘substances which produce a sort of fever resolve the types of intermittent fever. (very strong coffee, pepper, arnica, ignatia— bean, arsenic)
It was followed by several arguments for & against Hahnemann
 
We can conclude his developments up to Leipsic period as follows:
Due to the unreliability and insufficiency of the medical science and a never ending enthusiasm for knowledge and for his daily livelihood,Hahnemann started translating books, learning adjuvant sciences like chemistry & even metallurgy along with his practice . While working as a Forensic expert Hahnemann came across cases of arsenic poisoning and this made him to know about the hazards of fever mixtures- which was purely arsenic which was misused by he quacks. While doing the translator works he did not merely translate but added original information each time. , by personally working through the material. That led him to test the effect of medicines on himself and thereby to the subsequent formulation of the Law of similars

March 31st 1792 through an article published in a paper - Anziger” which appeared in Gotha Hahnernann criticised very roughly the manner in which Kaiser Leopold 11 of Austria was managed during an attack of fever. Repeated blood letting was done & which caused the death of the Emperor. This article against the Medical bulletin was followed by heated discussions. Many were in support of Hahnemann & many were against him.

After studying for several years , of diseases of the most lingering and hopeless nature in general and of venereal disorder ,cachexia ,hypochondriasis & insanity in particular Hahnemann planned to set up a unique convalescent home in Georgenthal near Gohat with the assistance of the Duke. .The Duke gave his hunting castle Georgenthal at Hahnemanns disposal. Then came a psychiatric’ patient called Klockenbring Hahnemann took a different attitude towards mental patients. He watched him for a week without giving medicine. He never allowed any be punished by blows or other painful procedures. He kept him alone without being disturbed by anyone even his wife. He considered that the effect produced by the personality of the physician himself is of great importance with friendliness & humanity,try to win the respect & confidence of the patient.These principles established by Hahnemann were entirely new to the psychiatry of that time Klockenbring was cured completely.

Hahnemann gave more importance for accessory measure, even early has this time Hahnemann had abandoned the usual method of prescribing large quantities of drugs.

After Klockenbring was cured there were no more mental patients forthcoming and Hahnemann was obliged to give up his institution.
Hahnemann offered to take such cases afterwards up to 1800, howewer Hahnemann did not treat any mental patients for any length of time and in the last case he undertook- that of the author Wezel- he found by experience that home treatment is not suitable for all cases of insanity Hahnemann also treated several patients through letters. His prescription constituted chiefly of advice in regard to their mode of life ,diet,etc.

After the closing of Georgenthal house Hahnemann started changing his stay in a rapid succession that within a span of ten years he covered 11 places from Georgenthal up to Torg in 1805 .This was truly the most destitute and stormy period in his life.
All the details should be collected by questioning the patient and those near him.
 
Regarding the knowledge of remedies he says that the remedies should be tested on healthy persons
- should be taken in unmixed form and the developments should be carefully recorded and discard all the auxiliary factors of influence
- Palliative employment of medicines is necessary only in a few cases —in the case of diseases that suddenly arises ,with almost immediate danger
- Medicine should be administered in the sma1le possible dose
- Single medicine at a time 

POISONS
 
All which are injurious and destructive to body are termed poisons.
--Medicine can become poison if injudiciously administered - in large doses and frequent repetitions If these substances are used in minute doses , are        very  beneficial to body . Thus it is the mode of administration which makes a substance poison or medicine.
--Sapere Aude - Dare to be wise is at first coined here (taken from Horace) and he adopted it in later editions of Organon as motto .
--1807-- ‘Indications of Homoeopathic employment of medicines in ordinary practice “ published in Hufeland s journal formed the basis of the “Introduction’ to the Organon and was prefaced to second and third edition
- Study the symptomatology in every case and select a remedy it should be administered in minimum dose because we do not require its complete disease produ cing but only the tendency in that direction.
--1808- ‘On the value of the Speculative systems of medicine especially in connection with the various systems of practice”
--All the existing systems are injurious to health.
“A candidate for the degree of M .D” - It was written after reading some notes of therapeutics of a famous professor which were passed onto him
1809 - ‘Ailgern Anz der Deutschen”- described patients as quackery.
--“On the prevailing fever”- sharp criticism of customary practice.
--“Essay on a new principle for ascertaining the curative power of drugs
- “Fragmenta Deviribus Medica mentorum
--“Medicine of experience


 
ORGANON OF RATIONAL MEDICINE

In this he summarised all the works so far done by him .
In the title page he wrote “Gellert’s verse
 “Truth for which all the e world is fain,
 Which makes us happy lies for ever more,
Not buried deep but lightly covered,O ver
By the wise Hand that destined it for men” 
In the later editions, he commenced with the motto
“Aude Sapere”--and altered the title as Organon of the Healing Art’.

Introduction to Organon:
 In order to cure gently ,quickly and lastingly, choose in every case of illines a remedy which can itself arouse a similar malady to that which it is to cure - Similia similibus.
--Hitherto nobody has taught this method of healing, but traces of its influence can be seen from the very ancient times. In “The localities of mankind’ which he ascribes a student’s of Hippocrates it is written as Illness arises by similar things and by similar things can the sick be made well. Vomiting can be made to cease by means of emetics, similarly cough and fever” - but nobody has taught or carried it out.

Next Page

 
 
 
   
Hosting supported by aippg .Copyright © Dr.Mansoor Ali
 Best viewed in 800/600 resolution and 24/32 bit colour.